Legal Opinion

Haiduk v. Atlantic Independent Union

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 30720PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

This is an action under 29 U.S.C.A. § 431(c) brought by a member of defendant union to permit him to examine certain union records. Attorney’s fees and costs are also requested. The statute in question states, in part:

“Every labor organization required to submit a report under this subchapter shall make available the information required to be contained in such report to all of its members, and every such labor organization and its officers shall be under a duty enforceable at the suit of any member of such organization in any State court of competent jurisdiction or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Sam Fox Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Pentland v. Dravo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  4. Thomas P. Knapp v. Bankers Securities Corporation Appeal of Bankers Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  5. Giesecke v. Denver Tramway CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gabel v. Hughes Air Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API