Legal Opinion

Hale v. Anglim

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 27, 1943No. 22344PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ST. SURE, District Judge.

Plaintiff sues to recover $3,757.93 which she claims she erroneously paid to defendant Collector as income tax for 1937. In her tax return plaintiff reported the sums of $6,230 and $5,450, representing dividends on stocks distributed to her upon a compromise agreement under the order of the State probate court, and by the trustee- of a testamentary trust respectively. The questions for decision are (1) whether the sum of $6,230, received as dividends by plaintiff, is exempt from taxation under § 22(b) (3) of the Revenue Act of 1936, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code § 22(b)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lyeth v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Freuler v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Nowland v. KierulffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Clayes v. NutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Estate of DalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bertha Lemle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API