Hale v. Anglim
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ST. SURE, District Judge.
Plaintiff sues to recover $3,757.93 which she claims she erroneously paid to defendant Collector as income tax for 1937. In her tax return plaintiff reported the sums of $6,230 and $5,450, representing dividends on stocks distributed to her upon a compromise agreement under the order of the State probate court, and by the trustee- of a testamentary trust respectively. The questions for decision are (1) whether the sum of $6,230, received as dividends by plaintiff, is exempt from taxation under § 22(b) (3) of the Revenue Act of 1936, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code § 22(b)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lyeth v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Freuler v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Nowland v. KierulffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Clayes v. NutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Estate of DalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bertha Lemle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978