R_ S v. B_ J_ J

OPINION

LAGARDE, Justice.

R_ and J_ S_ '(“Mr. S_” and “Mrs. S_” or collectively “the parents”) appeal an order naming appellees B and C J— (“Mr. J_” and “Mrs. J_” or collectively “the nonparents”) managing conservators of two of the parents’ three children.1 In two points of error, the parents (i) challenge the sufficiency of the evidence and (ii) argue that separating their children is against public policy. We affirm.

The parents have three children: R R— S_ (“B_”), L_M_S_ (“L_”), and J_ D_S_ (“P_”).2 L_and P_ (collectively *714“the children”) are the subject of this litigation. The testimony at…