Legal Opinion

Laubach v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 21, 1978No. 48984PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Justice:

This appeal arose out of a suit for damages resulting from a three car collision. The circumstances surrounding the accident itself are immaterial to the appeal. Plaintiff Laubach sued defendants Morgan and Martin. Defendant Martin cross-petitioned against defendant Morgan. 1 The case was tried to a jury under 23 O.S.1975 Supp. §§ 11, 12, Oklahoma’s version of comparative negligence. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff, finding he was damaged in the amount of $4,000.00. The jury apportioned the negligence of the parties in the following manner:

Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Walton v. TullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  4. Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Chesmore v. ChesmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Coney v. J. L. G. Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Bartlett v. New Mexico Welding Supply, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API