Legal Opinion

Kane, Kane & Kritzer, Inc. v. Altagen

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 18, 1980No. Civ. 57011PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

Appellant appeals from a judgment in its favor against an attorney for legal malpractice in the amount of $1,016.46 on the ground that the trial court committed error in finding a limited employment was undertaken by the respondent and in reducing appellant’s damages by the amount of the contingent fee respondent would have received had he not been negligent in handling appellant’s case.

Appellant’s complaint for malpractice alleged that respondent had orally agreed to prosecute an action against Wilsen Construction & Development Corporation (Wilsen) for $25,449.26 that it…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Benard v. WalkupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. McGlone v. LaceyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Saffer v. WilloughbySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Carbone v. TierneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. Warmbrodt v. BlanchardNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  4. McCafferty v. MusatColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Schultheis v. FrankeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API