Legal Opinion
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC. v. Patrick
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 4, 2011No. Civil Action 06-11295-WGYPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
I. Introduction
After long and contentious litigation, the Conservation Law Foundation (“CLF”) moves for the award of interim attorneys’ fees based upon this Court’s order of May II, 2010. On that date, this Court stated:
[I]t’s unmistakable that the Conservation Law Foundation is a prevailing party in this, in this proceeding and it may within 60 days of today’s date submit its full application for attorneys’ fees. Not, not to complete, because there may be more litigation, but what was necessary to bring us to this point. The order that I enter today…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Autozone, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Hermida v. ArchstoneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Sinclair v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- In re Volkswagen & Audi Warranty Extension LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Awuah v. COVERALL NORTH AMERICA, INC.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.