Legal Opinion

McQueen v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1997No. 97-SC-526-MRPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

STEPHENS, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Madison Circuit Court denying Appellant’s new RCr 11.42 motion and his renewed motion for a stay of his execution. In his present motion, he reiterates his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, this time asserting that the entire litigation staff of the Department of Public Advocacy, including its present director, conspired to deprive him of the assistance required by KRS 31.030(2). He also renews his claim of Brady violations, Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), ie., that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Harold McQueen Jr. v. Gene Scroggy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Gall v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  5. McQueen v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bowling v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Haight v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Sanborn v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Foley v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Bowling v. ParkerDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API