Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 2018No. 17CA011220PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLAHAN, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Jocquez Ross, appeals from an order of the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas, disqualifying his retained counsel of choice. This Court affirms.

I

{¶ 2} Mr. Ross was charged with a litany of offenses, including two counts of capital murder, following the deaths of a man ("the first victim") and the man's wife ("the second victim"). He chose to retain counsel and, over the next few months, either his retained counsel or his retained counsel's law partner appeared on his behalf at several pre-trials. At one of those pre-trials, the State notified the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. State v. ChamblissOhio Supreme Court · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. BenvenutoOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. State v. HackneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State v. GreenOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. State v. BairOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API