Legal Opinion

In re Tollios

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 13, 2013No. 09 B 19329PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CAROL A. DOYLE, Bankruptcy Judge.

Peter Dimitrius Tollios II and Judith Mae Tollios, the debtors in this chapter 13 case, filed a motion for sanctions against JP Morgan Chase (“Chase”) for allegedly violating Rule 3002.1(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. The debtors contend that Chase violated the rule because Chase sent them a notice of an increase in the escrow payment due under their mortgage loan but did not file a copy of the notice with the court or serve it on their attorney and the chapter 13 trustee. At issue is whether Rule 3002.1 applies to cases in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter Of: Warren C. Chappell and Barbara A. Chappell, Doing Business as Mister Photographer, Debtors, Appeal Of: Homebanc, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. In re WeigelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  3. In re GilbertUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2012

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Casamatta v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. (In re Freeman-Clay)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2017
  2. In re HowardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2016
  3. In re MorrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019
  4. In re SnowUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019
  5. Beiter v. Chase Home Fin., LLC (In re Beiter)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API