Legal Opinion

In re Morris

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 2019No. Case No. 18-13787-JDLPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Janice D. Loyd, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

I. Introduction

Quicken Loans Inc. ("Quicken") is the holder of a first mortgage on the Chapter 13 Debtor's residence. Debtor challenges the reasonableness of Quicken's claim of $ 900 for post-petition attorney's fees. Before the Court for consideration are: (1) Debtor's Amended Motion for Determination of Fees, Expenses, or Charges Pursuant to Rule 3002.1(E) [Doc. 37]; and (2) Response to Amended Motion to Determine Mortgage Fees and Expenses filed by Quicken Loans Inc. [Doc 41].

On April 12, 2019, the matter came on for evidentiary hearing.1 After…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  3. Robinson v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Baker Botts L.L.P. v. ASARCO LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Guillermo David NavarroUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2020
  2. Kyle Lee Kinderknecht and Chasity Dawn KinderknechtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2023
  3. Sharon SylvesterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API