In re Weigel
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERT G. MAYER, Bankruptcy Judge.
The question presented in this chapter 13 case is whether the adoption of Fed. R.Bankr.Proc. 3002.1 requires a lender, in a case pending when the rule became effective, to file a late proof of claim so that it may comply^with the new rule. This case was filed before December 1, 2011, the effective date of Rule 3002.1. The lender had not filed a proof of claim because there was no prepetition arrearage. The bar date to file a proof of claim expired before the rule became effective. Rule 3002.1 requires lenders secured by a debtor’s principal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re CarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- In Re NwonwuUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- In Re BlakelyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- In re ThongtaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2012
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re TolliosUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- In re FitchUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2015
- In re PEGGY C. MANISUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026