Legal Opinion

In re Weigel

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided December 6, 2012No. 10-17639-RGMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERT G. MAYER, Bankruptcy Judge.

The question presented in this chapter 13 case is whether the adoption of Fed. R.Bankr.Proc. 3002.1 requires a lender, in a case pending when the rule became effective, to file a late proof of claim so that it may comply^with the new rule. This case was filed before December 1, 2011, the effective date of Rule 3002.1. The lender had not filed a proof of claim because there was no prepetition arrearage. The bar date to file a proof of claim expired before the rule became effective. Rule 3002.1 requires lenders secured by a debtor’s principal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re CarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  2. In Re NwonwuUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  3. In Re BlakelyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
  4. In re ThongtaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2012

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re TolliosUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  2. In re FitchUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2015
  3. In re PEGGY C. MANISUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API