Legal Opinion

Hasken v. City of Louisville

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided December 17, 2002No. Civil Action 3:00CV-546-SPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SIMPSON, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on cross motions for partial summary judgment on the issue of equitable tolling pursuant to FecLR.Civ.P. 56. (DN 165, 166) Both parties have extensively briefed the issues. We address equitable tolling only as it pertains to claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Background

This case involves the method by which the defendant, the City of Louisville (“City”), compensated its firefighters. Plaintiffs, Michael Hasken and Gregg Hasken, (hereinafter the term “Haskens” refers to all plaintiffs who have filed their consent…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Saeid B. Amini v. Oberlin CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. Joseph F. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Gwendolyn T. Graham-Humphreys, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Memphis Brooks Museum of Art, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Horace Lee Dunlap v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roslies-Perez v. SUPERIOR FORESTRY SERVICE, INC.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009
  2. Ware v. CKF Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API