Legal Opinion
Watt Ex Rel. Watt v. Mittelstadt
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 12, 1985No. WD 35841PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Judge.
This is a civil action in garnishment. The appeal is taken from a judgment quashing the garnishment. The judgment is affirmed.
Some preliminary remarks are in order to reveal the events which led to the present proceeding. On or about November 5, 1981, James and Jane Mittelstadt visited the home of Mr. and Mrs. Kevin Watt. The Watts have a minor son, Gregory. At the time, Gregory was four years old. The Mittelstadts had a dog named “Budweiser” who accompanied them to the Watts home. During the visit, Budweiser attacked and injured Gregory. Gregory Watt, by his natural father as…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Giokaris v. KincaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- Pamperin v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Charlene Harper v. Vigilant Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. HavnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. v. MarlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Devine v. Gateway Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. BishopMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.