Legal Opinion

Gamble v. Main

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1983No. 15390PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice:

The plaintiffs, James and Elizabeth Gamble, appeal from a final order of the Circuit Court of Brooke County denying their motion for a new trial. They contend that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the theory of implied warranty of habitability or fitness in their suit against the builder of their home. They also argue that the trial court erred in giving the builder’s instruction regarding his nonlia-bility for undisclosed defects in soil conditions.

Many of the facts are not in dispute. In the fall of 1976, the Gambles contacted several home…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Humber v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Petersen v. Hubschman Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  5. ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Zando, Martin & Milstead, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sewell v. GregoryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing Homeowners Ass'n v. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Teter v. Old Colony Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Jefferson County Board of Education v. Jefferson County Education Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API