Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ward v. Stoddard

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1911Published

Appeal by the judgment debtor from an order of the City Court -of -the city of Mew York, adjudging the appellant guilty of a contempt of said court.

1Concurrence

Giegerich, J. (concurring).

I concur in the result reached by Justice Brady in this case. I am of the opinion, however, that one justice of the City Court has power and authority to continue supplementary proceedings instituted before another justice. It was held in Vogel v. Ninmark, 62 Misc. Rep. 591; 116 N. Y. Supp. 823, that an alteration of an order in such proceedings similar to the one made in the order in the case at bar was unauthorized and that the order was a nullity. In the case of Bridges v. Koppelman, 63 Misc. Rep. 27; 117 N. Y. Supp. 306, as stated by Mr. Justice Brady, there is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bridges v. KoppelmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1909
  2. Friedman v. Metropolitan Steamship Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. McAlpin v. StoddardAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907
  4. Vogel v. NinmarkNew York Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Buchsbaum v. LaueNew York Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API