Moore v. City of Tulsa
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CLAIRE V. EAGAN, District Judge.
Now before the Court are defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. # 23), and motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #24)1 Defendants move to dismiss on the ground that the amended complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted as to plaintiffs claims for denial of due process, retaliation, and tortious interference. Dkt. # 23, at 15-31. They also argue that plaintiffs claims against Fire Chief Driskell in his official *1340capacity should be dismissed as duplica-tive,2 and that Fire Chief Driskell in his individual…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arthur v. Bloomfield School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Byron v. University of UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
- Clark v. Bryan County School District 1, Silo Public SchoolsDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2022
- Hurt v. City of Tulsa, OklahomaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2025
- Morgan v. City of PryorDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.