Legal Opinion
Arthur v. Bloomfield School District
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided June 17, 2015No. 13-CV-1173-MV-WPLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Bloomfield School District and- Defendant Bloomfield School District Board of Education’s (collectively, the “Governmental Defendants”) Motion and Memorandum for Summary Judgment [Doc. 101] and Defendant Rob Ford’s Motion and Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment [Doc. 102]. The Court, having considered the Motions, briefs, attached materials, relevant law, and being otherwise fully informed, finds that the Defendants’ Motions are well-taken and will be GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pennsylvania State Police v. SudersSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Porro v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- James L. Bolden, Jr. v. Prc Inc., Formerly Known as Planning Research Corporation, and Robert CarverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Morris v. City of Colorado SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- MacKenzie v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alabi v. PerdueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Steven M. Ford v. Sherwin-WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2026