Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Morgan

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2009No. 25205, 25212PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] A purchaser of residential real estate brought suit against a seller for fraudulent concealment of the fact that the driveway encroached on a neighbor’s property. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the purchaser. Holding that there was insufficient evidence that the seller was aware of the encroachment, the circuit court granted a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Because we find that the seller owed no duty to the purchaser by the time the suit was commenced, we affirm.

Background

[¶ 2.] In 1997, Gregg and Sharon Schwartz purchased a residence at 53 Sunset…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kuper v. Lincoln-Union Electric Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Bridge v. Karl's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Engelhart v. KramerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Chrysler Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Lindskov v. LindskovSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Cooper v. RangSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Hoven v. Banner Associates, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Beals v. Autotrac, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API