Legal Opinion

R.H. Macy & Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1990No. 89-671PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

As a preliminary matter, Macy contends that the court of appeals could not properly consider the affidavit of Judge Rüey which was executed after the jury verdict and which was not part of the trial court record. We find that the court of appeals improperly relied on the affidavit, although our finding is not dispositive of the present appeal.

In State v. Ishmail (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 402, 405-406, 8 O.O. 3d 405, 407, 377 N.E. 2d 500, 502, we stated that:

“Since a reviewing court can only reverse the judgment of a trial court if it finds error in the proceedings of such court, it follows that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Presley v. City of NorwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Mudrich v. Standard Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Bowling v. Heil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Leibreich v. A.J. Refrigeration, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Miles v. Kohli & Kaliher Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,882 James P. Conde Rhonda L. Conde James R. Conde Autumn Conde and Kimberly Conde v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. Queen City Terminals, Inc. v. General American Transportation Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API