Legal Opinion

Vandement v. Trisler

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided June 15, 1896Published

1Opinion of the CourtHollister, J.

The plaintiff obtained a judgment by default before a justice of the peace. The defendant asks a reversal on the ground that the return of the constable of the writ of summons does not show a compliance with the requirements of the statute prescribing the manner in w'hich the service of summons and the return thereof shall be made.

Section 6475, Revised Statutes, provides, among other things, that the summons “must contain the name or names of the defendant or defendants * * * and command the officer * * * serving the same to summon the defendant or defendants to appear * * * at a time therein…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Laney v. GarbeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Lauderdale v. R. & T. A. Ennis Stationery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Midkiff v. LusherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Strayhorn v. . BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. McConkey v. McCraneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API