Lauderdale v. R. & T. A. Ennis Stationery Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Lampasas. Tried below before Hon. W. A. Blackburn. The opinion gives a statement.
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Associate Justice.
This was a suit upon a promissory note brought by the appellee against R. D. Lauderdale, who was alleged in the petition’to reside in Lampasas County, and J. W. Laud erdale and B. H. Lauderdale, alleged to reside in Burleson County. There was a judgment by default against all of the defendants.
Without there being at any time an amendment of plaintiff’s petition, citations for J. W. Lauderdale and B. H. Lauderdale were issued on the same date to both Washington and Burleson Counties, the names of both of said defendants being included in each writ. The writ to Burleson…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ward v. LattimerTexas Supreme Court · 1847
- Baber v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kimmell v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Midwest Piping & Supply Co. v. PageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Pierson v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Tyler v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co. v. HaglerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.