Legal Opinion

Sikes v. Segers

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 15, 1979No. 79-60PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carleton Harris, Chief Justice.

This is the second appeal of this case. Sikes v. Segers, 263 Ark. 164, 563 S.W.2d 441, reflects that the trial court ruled that appellant’s action for alienation of affection was barred by the statute of limitations, and this holding was not appealed by appellant. The trial court also held that the malpractice action brought by Sikes against appellee was not barred by the statute of limitations, and this ruling was not appealed. However, appellee asked for a summary judgment, which the court granted due to its finding that appellant’s handwritten affidavit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Silbiger v. Prudence Bonds CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. Norfleet v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. American-Canadian Oil & Drilling Corp. v. Aldridge & StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Sikes v. SegersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Johnson v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Poyner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Crawford & Lewis v. Boatmen's Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Nations v. NationsDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1987
  4. State v. VittitowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Hughes v. GibbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API