Legal Opinion

Sicard v. Gumbel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 28, 1904No. 14,891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Parish of Pointe Coupée; E. B. Talbot, Judge. Action by H. C. Sieard and others against Ferdinand Gumbel. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, J.

This is a petitory action brought by six of the seven children and heirs to recover their interest in a tract of land which at one time belonged to the community existing between F. M. Sieard and Emma Sieard, his wife. The defendant, by way of exception, pleads the prescription of five and ten years, and that his title cannot be attacked collaterally, estoppel, and want of tender of the purchase price, and, for answer, sets up title in himself under a sale-made-in the succession of Mrs. Emma Sieard, and alleges that he is a possessor in good faith. In the event…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marsh v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
  2. Hibernia National Bank v. Sarah Planting & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. Alexander v. BourdierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bender v. ChewSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  2. Blunson v. KnightonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Bradford-Kennedy Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. Callahan v. AuthementLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Shreveport Packing Co. v. MarrsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API