Legal Opinion

Hibernia National Bank v. Sarah Planting & Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 15, 1901No. 13,495PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Nineteenth J udicial District, Parish of Iberia— Yoorhies, J. The Opinion of the Court, on Motion to Dismiss, was delivered by Watkins, J. On the Merits, by Blanchard, J. On Eehearing, by Provosty, J.

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Watkins, J.

The third opponent and appellee seeks to dismiss the appeal on the ground (1) that no citation of appeal has ever been issued to, or served upon him, as the law requires; (2) that the appellant has not furnished an appeal bond in conformity to law.

The latter ground is only urged in the alternative that the former should not be sustained.

I

The averment of the motion is, that no citation of appeal has been directed to the third opponent nor served upon him as required by law, either in person or otherwise.

It appears…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cockerham v. BosleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. EdwardsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Gast v. GastSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  3. Sicard v. GumbelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  4. Buckley v. Lindsey Mercantile Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Sellers v. SellersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API