Legal Opinion
Langley v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 18, 2007No. 06-3219PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.
Brenda Langley ran into problems with her coworkers while working for Daimler-Chrysler Corporation. The personnel problems escalated to the point that Langley took a leave of absence from the company. She placed the blame for her problems on DaimlerChrysler and one of her coworkers, Debra Lobzun. After failing to resolve the matter internally, Langley sued.
The district court considered Langley’s claims and evidence in light of the defendants’ requests for summary judgment. Finding no genuine issue of material fact on any of her claims, the district court granted…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robert Cromwell v. Equicor-Equitable Hca Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Jayedeane Thompson v. American Home Assurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- John Harden v. Keith HillmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Clemente v. VASLOCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Daft v. Advest, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Ledura Watkins v. Robert HealyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Petroleum Enhancer, LLC v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.