Legal Opinion
Daft v. Advest, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 23, 2011No. 08-3212, 10-3151PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNELIA G. KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
In this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), Plaintiffs brought suit for the improper denial of pension benefits under Defendant Advest, Inc.’s Account Executive Nonqualified Defined Benefit Plan (the “AE Plan” or “Plan”). After Plaintiffs exhausted their claim before the Administrative Committee for the AE Plan (the “Committee” or “AE Plan Committee”) and both parties briefed an appeal from the Committee’s denial of benefits, the district court granted summary judgment to Plaintiffs on their claim that the AE Plan…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Mary Smith v. Regional Transit Authority, eCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Cheryl Wallace v. Oakwood Hosp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Sally Sanzone v. Mercy HealthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Dahl v. Charles F. Dahl, M.D., P.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Operating Eng'rs Local 324 v. Rieth-Riley Constr. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.