Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. v. Higgason
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss
The Casualty Company, plaintiff-in-error, challenges recoveries in these six consolidated cases, in favor of defendants-in-error on an automobile liability policy issued to W. C. Wright, doing business at Shelbyville, Tennessee, as Wright Motor Company. Defendants-in-error had recovered judgments aggregating more than $10,000, the limit of the policy, against Wright in actions brought to recover for personal injuries suffered in an automobile collision with a car driven by one Malone, who was at the time an employee in an automobile garage and sales business owned by Wright at Murfreesboro,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Baldwin Motor Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Insurance Co. of North America v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Oehme v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Haverty Furniture Co. v. FoustTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
- State Automobile Mut. Ins. v. Connable-Joest, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Petition of YoungbloodTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Clark Motor Co. v. United Pacific InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Transamerica Insurance Group v. Stephen George Beem and Wife, Joan Beem, Transamerica Insurance Group v. William Douglas BoothCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Southern Fire and Casualty Company v. CooperTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. v. WendlingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.