Republic of Hawaii v. Ben
Hawaii Supreme Court
Appeal from District Couet op Honolulu.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT BY
WHITING, J.
The defendant was charged with using vulgar and obscene language in a public place in Honolulu, etc., and appeals to this court on the -following points of law certified by the District Magistrate:
1. That the finding and conviction of the District Court in the above case is contrary to law.
2. That the place where the alleged language was used is not a public place within the meaning of Chap. LXI. of the Session Laws of 1892.
3. That the alleged language is not vulgar, profane and obscene language, and the use of language as proved does not constitute an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CoombsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Foster v. BlountSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- State v. SowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- The Queen v. San TanaHawaii Supreme Court · 1893
- Shields v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PrevoHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
- Hawaiian Trust Co. v. BorthwickHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
- Territory of Hawaii v. MartinHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
- Territory v. KaaikaulaHawaii Supreme Court · 1914