Territory v. Kaaikaula
Hawaii Supreme Court
Appeal prom District Magistrate op Honolulu.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT BY
QUARLES, J:
The defendant was convicted in the district court on the charge of using vulgar, profane and obscene language in a public place in violation of section 3188 R. L., was fined five dollars without costs, and has appealed to this court on the question of law whether the words “you big fat Buffalo, you damn son of a bitch,” addressed by one woman to another, during the course of a quarrel, constitute an offense under the statute. The statute forbids the use of “vulgar, profane or obscene language * * * in any public place.” No question as to duplicity in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Swearingen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Robertson v. EdelsteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Schurick v. KollmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Craig v. PylesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
- Shields v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. ChesterfieldMunicipal Court of The Virgin Islands · 1967