Legal Opinion

Territory of Hawaii v. Martin

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Honolulu.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

The defendant was found guilty by the District Magistrate of the offense of common nuisance in the first degree by making an indecent exposure of his person in a public place, to wit, the Beach Hoad in Honolulu. The only point of law appealed on is that the judgment is contrary to the law and to the evidence and to the weight of the evidence. The evidence adduced is sufficient to support a finding that at the time charged the defendant made what was undoubtedly an indecent exposure of his person to a girl twelve years old and that this was accompanied with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WardellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. State v. MillardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
  3. Republic of Hawaii v. BenHawaii Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RockerHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. WhitneyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. RockerHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Territory v. FujiwaraHawaii Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API