Fontenot v. White
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
Plaintiffs allege they are man and wife, and that Florence Fontenot is a citizen of the Creek Nation, duly enrolled as such, and was allotted certain lands in the Creek Nation, and defendants White, Casteel, and Thompson conspired with one Joe Howard, Fannie Acey, a woman by the name of “James,” and two persons, to plaintiff unknown, to deprive her of her lands by fraud; that plaintiff was prior to March 23, 1921, a minor; that defendants sent Joe Howard to plaintiff’s home in an automobile, and Howard stated defendants wanted to buy a part of the royalties on plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wimberly v. WinstockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Brooks v. GarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Long v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Armstrong, Cator & Co. v. LachmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888
- Bottoms v. NeukirchnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Newbern v. FarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Barrows v. AlfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Likowski v. CatlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Noble v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Lindsay v. BrittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.