Hsam Inc. v. Gatter
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
ON APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
BIERY, Justice.
Appellee’s motion for rehearing is denied; our opinion of July 10, 1991, is withdrawn and this opinion is substituted.
“Laws are made for men of ordinary understanding, and should, therefore, be construed by the ordinary rules of common sense. Their meaning is not to be sought for in metaphysical subtleties, which may make anything mean everything or nothing, at pleasure.” 1 We are presented with the issue of whether a common sense construction of the Consumer Credit Code requires a multi-thousand dollar recovery for a potential two cent loss.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Danziger v. San Jacinto Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Anguiano v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. SmailTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Thornhill v. Sharpstown Dodge Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Yates Ford, Inc. v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Green v. Parrack, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- Boorhem-Fields, Inc. v. Burlington Northern Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
- Leonard & Harral Packing Co. v. Ward, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1994
- Box v. Flynn, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
- Manasco v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.