Legal Opinion

Yates Ford, Inc. v. Ramirez

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1985No. C-3318PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAY, Justice.

This is an appeal from five suits alleging violations of the motor vehicle installment sales provisions of the Texas Consumer Credit Code, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5069-7.01 et seq. The trial court rendered judgments that each of the consumers take nothing from Yates Ford, Inc. and Ford Motor Credit Company. The court of appeals reversed and remanded the cases to the trial court with instructions that the consumers be awarded twice the amount of the time price differential contracted for plus reasonable attorney’s fees. 675 S.W.2d 232.1 We reverse the judgments of the court of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Beckendorff v. Harris-Galveston Coastal Subsidence DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Hight v. Jim Bass Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Beckendorff v. Harris-Galveston Coastal Subsidence DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Thornhill v. Sharpstown Dodge Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Housing Authority of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Restaurant Development, Inc. v. Cananwill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Restaurant Development, Inc. v. Cananwill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Green v. Parrack, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  5. Enell Corp. v. Longoria, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API