Legal Opinion

Mark Peterson Dental Laboratory, Inc. v. Kral

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1983No. 10849PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.

This case presents an appeal from the trial court’s grant of a judgment against Dr. Bruce M. Kral individually and not against his solely owned professional association, Dr. Bruce M. Kral, D.D.S., Inc.

Two assignments of error have been raised challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. These were briefed together and will be treated likewise.

Assignments of Error

“I. The trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s case and again at the close of all the evidence.
“II. The judgment of the trial court is manifestly against the weight of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Crawford v. HalkovicsOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. James G. Smith & Associates, Inc. v. EverettOhio Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sommer v. FrenchOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Spectrum Reporting L.L.C. v. Abroms, 07ap-899 (7-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Dunn v. WestlakeOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Gatto Electric Supply Co. v. PickupOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API