Legal Opinion

Klender v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 2, 2004No. 02-10082-BCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LAWSON, District Judge.

This case presents the issue of whether installment payments toward a fixed sum made to school teachers by their school districts as an inducement to relinquish their tenure rights and retire early constitute “wages” from which deductions must be made under the Federal Insurance and Contribution Act (FICA), 26 U.S.C. § 3101, et seq. Although this issue has not yet been addressed by the Sixth Circuit, a similar case decided by the Eighth Circuit answered…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Appoloni v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Appoloni v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. Donald F. Appoloni, Sr., Russell C. Bergemann, and Charles Bryce Engle v. United States of America, Phyllis F. Klender, William B. Rase, and Roger J. Petri v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API