Legal Opinion
DeSena v. Beekley Corp.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided August 3, 2010No. Civil 09-352-P-HPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
* DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR CLAIMS CONSTRUCTION, SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO EXCLUDE EXPERT WITNESSES
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
This case is primarily a patent dispute. It involves skin markers that medical practitioners use to demarcate a particular area or feature of concern that will then be highlighted on subsequent x-rays. There are also accusations of trademark infringement, false advertising, false patent marking, and deceptive trade practices. After a hearing on June 3, 2010, I construe the claims of the two patents held by the warring patent holders, and rule upon their…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bern Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Activision TV, Inc. v. Pinnacle Bancorp, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2013
- Componex Corp. v. Electronics for Imaging, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014