Legal Opinion

La Rose v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided November 3, 1950No. Claim No. 29916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

Claimant asserts a claim ‘ ‘ for trespass, nuisance, interference with the use of claimant’s land and permanent damages as a result of the State’s changing drainage of the area in vicinity of premises owned by claimant.” He also alleges that on or about October 10,1947, the State ‘ ‘ wrongfully entered plaintiff’s land and constructed a ditch thereon * * * to claimant’s great and permanent damage ” and further that the State “ erected a culvert or culverts under the roads adjoining claimant’s said premises and maintain and have since maintained said culvert or culverts in so wrongful and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dietzel v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Ortalano v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Petzold v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1952
  2. Mitchell v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1960
  3. Tompkins v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1962
  4. West v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954
  5. Kosciuszko v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API