La Rose v. State
New York Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
Claimant asserts a claim ‘ ‘ for trespass, nuisance, interference with the use of claimant’s land and permanent damages as a result of the State’s changing drainage of the area in vicinity of premises owned by claimant.” He also alleges that on or about October 10,1947, the State ‘ ‘ wrongfully entered plaintiff’s land and constructed a ditch thereon * * * to claimant’s great and permanent damage ” and further that the State “ erected a culvert or culverts under the roads adjoining claimant’s said premises and maintain and have since maintained said culvert or culverts in so wrongful and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dietzel v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Ortalano v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1934
3Cited by8 opinions
- Petzold v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1952
- Mitchell v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1960
- Tompkins v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1962
- West v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954
- Kosciuszko v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.