Legal Opinion

Ortalano v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided January 10, 1934No. Claim No. 21768; Claim No. 21769PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

In the work of eliminating a railroad grade crossing by constructing the highway over the railroad the State cut off and abandoned for'the distance of about 800 feet the old ditch running along the south side of the road. At the railroad a new ditch was constructed under the new overhead bridge and across the bed of the old highway. It ran from southeast to northwest about 100 feet, turned toward the west, converged toward the highway, and then ran parallel to it to a culvert.

*145The culvert had existed for many years and was not rebuilt or altered when the grade crossing elimination work Was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winchell v. Town CamillusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Bowman v. . Town of ChenangoNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Gould v. . BoothNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Bull v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  5. Winchell v. . Town of CamillusNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. La Rose v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1950
  2. Logan v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1937
  3. Castellani v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API