Legal Opinion
Petzold v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided June 30, 1952No. Claim No. 31162PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
This is a motion made by the Attorney-General for an order dismissing both a notice of intention filed by the claimants herein on February 9, 1951, and a claim filed by the *256claimants herein on January 26, 1952. The notice of motion states that it is based on the ground that claimants have failed to set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the State of New York and on the further ground that neither the notice of intention nor the claim was timely filed and that this court does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine the claim. Bequest is also made for such other…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pappenheim v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Noonan v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Harvey Chalmers & Son, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Dufel v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Reisert v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Drake v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1979
- West v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954
- Bensen v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1976
- Cox v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1981
- Stewart v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.