Legal Opinion

Branum v. Fry's Food Stores

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 6, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01608Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Luca Branum, No. CV-21-01608-PHX-DLR 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Fry's Food Stores, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Pending before the Court are Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a 17 claim (Doc. 7) and Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend (Doc. 18). The Court grants the 18 motion to dismiss and denies leave to amend. 19 To survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain factual 20 allegations sufficient to “raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” Bell Atl. Corp. 21…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Jack Allen v. City of Beverly HillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Patrick Novak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. May v. Parker-Abbott Transfer and Storage, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API