Legal Opinion

Carter v. Thomas

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1851PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR to the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

This was an action of assumpsit by Susan Thomas, administratrix upon the estate of Henry Thomas, deceased, against Chauncey Carter, in his individual capacity, upon the following" instrument:

“Spear S. Tipton, Chauncey Carter, and Jordan Vigus, administrators of John Tipton, deceased, will please pay Henry Thomas, or order, 88 dollars and 50 cents, and oblige yours, &c., H. B. McKeen. January 21, 1843.”

The acceptances on said order were as follows:

“ Accepted, as administrator, 4th February, 1843. S. S. Tipton
“Accepted, to be paid when funds are received for the estate. C. Carter,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. De Valengin's Administrators v. DuffySupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. Shanklin v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Mills v. KuykendallIndiana Supreme Court · 1827
  4. Darter v. State ex rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1838

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holderbaugh v. TurpinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Hayes v. ShirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Cornthwaite v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Brown v. ForstIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Bott v. BarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API