Legal Opinion

Levine v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1977No. Civ. 49136PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

The case at bench raises the issue of the applicability of the doctrine of comparative negligence enunciated in Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804 [119 Cal.Rptr. 858, 532 P.2d 1226] to government tort liability. We conclude that the Li rule is applicable so that a plaintiff’s contributory negligence is not a total bar to his recovery in a suit under the Tort Claims Act. We conclude also that city’s other contentions on appeal lack substance and discuss them in the appendix to this opinion to avoid distraction from the portion which merits publication.

Facts

Woodley…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Cameron v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Curreri v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lopez v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Lonberg v. City of RiversideDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
  4. Societa Per Azioni De Navigazione Italia v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Rodriguez v. Inglewood Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API