Legal Opinion
Kadish, Hinkel & Weibel Co., L.P.A. v. Rendina
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 15, 1998No. 72459PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Patricia Ann Blackmon, Administrative Judge.
Appellant Paul A. Rendina appeals a decision by the trial court in favor of appellee Kadish, Hinkel & Weibel Co., L.P.A. (the “law firm”) in its breach-of-contract action. Rendina assigns the following error for our review:
“The trial court erred and abused its discretion in denying appellant’s motion to vacate judgment.”
Having reviewed the record and the legal arguments of the parties, we reverse the judgment of the trial court. The apposite facts follow.
On December 15, 1995, the law firm filed a complaint against Paul and Janet Rendina for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Caruso-Ciresi, Inc. v. LohmanOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Mount Olive Baptist Church v. Pipkins Paints & Home Improvement Center, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1979
- BancOhio National Bank v. SchiesswohlOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Syphard v. VrableOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- PC Surveillance.Net, L.L.C. v. Rika Group, Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. LagowskiOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Fernwalt v. Our Lady of KilgoreOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Daimler Chrysler Fin. v. L.N.H., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.