Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. United States Department of Agriculture
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
CHARLES C. LOVELL, Senior District Judge.
Now before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the Plaintiff Alliance for the Wild Rockies (“AWR”) and the Federal Defendants. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion is denied and Defendants’ motion is granted in its entirety.1
AWR's motion for. summary judgment asserts that the Federal Defendants’ failure to address the environment impacts on the threatened Yellowstone grizzly bear resulting from low-altitude helicopter bison hazing operations during spring and summer months is arbitrary and capricious,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sierra Club v. SalazarDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2013