Legal Opinion

Howell v. Anderson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 18, 1912No. Gen. No. 16.864PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Mechanics’ lien. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henry C. Ward, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

Suit was brought by Thomas S. Howell, as plaintiff (plaintiff in error here), against John Emil Anderson, A. Biggs Sash and Door Company, Frank M. McKey, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the A. Biggs Sash and Door Company, John Lewis Cochran and Bryan Lathrop, as defendants (defendants in error here). The suit was of the fourth class. Summons was served on all of the defendants except Bryan Lathrop. The default of the two defendants, A. Biggs Sash and Door Company and Frank M. McKey, as trustee in bankruptcy, etc., was entered. The appearance of John Emil Anderson and John Lewis Cochran-was entered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Claflin v. DunneIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Kingsland v. KoeppeIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Harty Bros. & Harty Co. v. PolakowIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Davidson v. BondIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  5. Felsenthal v. DurandIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. v. Manulife Real Estate Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Lord Lumber & Fuel Co. v. HancockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API