Legal Opinion

Harty Bros. & Harty Co. v. Polakow

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1908PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal front the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Flon. Henry C. BeitlER, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

Harty Bros. Sr.Harty Co., a corporation, brought this suit in assumpsit in the municipal court of Chicago against Samuel Polakow and Bass Sr Bornstein. Polakow engaged Bass Sr Bornstein to do the carpenter work for him on a building in Chicago. Appellant contracted with Bass Sr Bornstein to furnish the mill work for such building. . This action was brought to recover for the balance due under appellant’s contract with Bass & Bornstein for the mill - work or interior finish on said building, under section 28 of the Lien act of 1903. (Hurd’s Stat. 1908, p. 1372.) All the preliminary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Steamship Co. v. JoliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Coverdale v. Royal ArcanumIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Chudnovski v. EckelsIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Lillard v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. Bowen v. HoxieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. DummerIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Heimberger v. Elliot Frog & Switch Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Pennington v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Brown v. GersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  5. Barry v. KnightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API