Legal Opinion
Frederico Lowe-Bey v. Michael Groose
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 5, 1994No. 93-2034PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
Fredrico Lowe-Bey appeals from a final judgment entered in the United States District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Missouri denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Lowe-Bey v. Groose, No. 4:92CV224 (E.D.Mo. Mar. 8, 1993) (memorandum and order). Petitioner asserts that the district court erred in dismissing his ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims as procedurally barred and dismissing the remaining claims on the merits. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
1. BACKGROUND
Lowe-Bey…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Patton v. YountSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Moore v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Robert T. Sidebottom v. Paul Delo Jay NixonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Hannah v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Sheik Mark S. Moore-El v. Al LuebbersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Robert Osborne v. James D. Purkett, Superintendent, Eastern Missouri Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.