Legal Opinion

Vaara v. Ketchikan Spruce Mills

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1967No. 829PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before NESBETT, C. J., DIMOND and RABINOWITZ, JJ. RABINOWITZ, Justice.

Involved in this appeal is construction of our mechanic’s and materialmen’s statutes. 1 The superior court entered a judgment in favor of appellee Ketchikan Spruce Mills establishing a materialmen’s lien in its behalf and decreeing that the lien be foreclosed against appellant Vaara’s interest in certain real property. We have concluded that the'case must be remanded to the trial court for more detailed and explicit findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The crux of this litigation concerns the applicability and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Patrick v. SedwickAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Arthur B. Siri, Inc. v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Sandberg v. PalmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Young v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wigger v. OlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Miller v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Lakloey, Inc. v. BallekAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Moores v. Alaska Metal Buildings, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Miller v. OgdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API