Legal Opinion
Dietrich v. Sun Exploration & Production Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 10, 1992No. 87-70451PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GADOLA, District Judge.
This suit involves a royalty interest in tracts of land in the Columbus III oil. field in St. Clair County, Michigan. The field is leased to and operated by defendants Sun Exploration Company and Sun Operating Limited Partnership. Plaintiffs Edgar J. and Theresita Dietrich filed their five-count amended complaint April 11, 1988. Count II of plaintiffs amended complaint has been dismissed. After numerous motions, including two by defendants for dismissal, defendants…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Edgar J. Dietrich and Theresita Dietrich v. Sun Exploration and Production Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Sun Operating Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Dietrich v. Sun Exploration & Production Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992