Legal Opinion

Roe v. Yarmouth Lumber, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 20, 2001Published

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] The employee, John A. Roe, appeals from a decision of a hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board granting Roe’s petitions for award, but denying incapacity benefits pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 214(1)(A) (2001). The hearing officer found that Roe refused an offer of reinstatement without good and reasonable cause, and, accordingly, was disqualified from receiving benefits during the period of the refusal. Roe contends that the hearing officer’s decision is contrary to a Board rule providing that section 214 is not applicable when the employer is paying benefits “without…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Loud v. Kezar Falls Woolen Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  2. Goff v. Central Maine Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. Holt v. School Administrative District No. 6Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  4. Libby v. Boise Cascade Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API